|
The punitive operation of Israel: vote-catching maneuver and accomplished fact
published on Wednesday, December 31, 2008
|
|
Topicality
0 | | | | | | | | | All
Videos
0 | | | | | | | | | All
|
Israeli military operation in the Gaza Strip defies, in term of anticipated result, the understanding. Such an operation, in an urban area , cannot be carried out that in a terrestrial way so much the impossibility of strike targeted without important civil damage is impossible. To want, and it would be the aim of the operation, to destroy Hamas, is absolutely unrealizable without muscular occupation of the Gaza Strip.
What seeks Israel?
This military operation is too close to the legislative elections (in Israel), next February, as of the installation of the new administration in the United States not to see “another thing there” only one simple punitive operation which would prepare another combat, in particular that of against . which, aiming at the post of , would intentionally harden its Arab anti policy accommodated traditionally well the day before any election in Israel to make sure the full one with the voting rights of the Arab anti electorate?
A signed maneuvre : to hurry in the invasion with the calculated downstream of the Bush administration and to swipe voting rights for the legislative ones.
The rockets of Hamas aiming at the south of Israel would be thus as many ballot papers for , an electoral pretext good useful to destroy Hamas and to oblige to take at the same time note and to put it at the foot of the wall of a regional policy for the contours imposed by Israel, whereas one lends to the future tenant of the #FFFFFF House Palestinian sympathies.
Jacques
.
essages of forum
-
It is ! One does not intend certain worldwide management to offend OUT OF PROPORTION attack of Israel on Gaza whereas they quickly reacted to the response (disproportionate) Russian to defend their compatriots in and .
To answer this message
-
You joke Damocles! one understands only that, criticisms of the operation from Israel to Gaza on all our media, radio, TV, etc…. But it is what a proportioned answer?
That made of the years that Hamas bombards the Israeli civilians with thousands of and others…. Admittedly our media give little a report of dead and the Israeli casualties. But we do not leave .
From how much launched towards its territory a democracy does have it to react?
To answer this message
-
I note that you did not look at the media in an intelligent way, how can one legitimate the massacre of people which since the arrival of the Jews ace ceased being persecuted…
I know that drawn from the rockets on civilians is not a solution, but that a state keep silent and massacres a whole population is of an inhuman cruelty…
I think rather than the Israeli army tries to find a credibility following the humiliation which they received in the south Lebanon… With share bombarded with their , they were swept by the with each terrestrial offensive…
I you consultings to inform you instead of affirming things which do not have any direction…
To conclude the Israeli army passed from large army to an army which can only bombard civilians for want of anything better…
To answer this message
-
The ambition of Israel with the difference of Hamas is not the destruction of the other camp It should be recalled that Israel does not have any interest that it is economic, geopolitical to maintain a conflict with the Palestinians and the Arab world in general and that in fact well the Hamas as well as Iran refuses any reconnaissance of the State of Israel. Moreover, I am sorry to see all the judgments which rain on the I and State of Israel which is bombarded each day by missiles and aiming at civil populations specify quite civil because the aim of the terrorists of Hamas is OPENLY the MURDER of Israeli citizens. How in particular French European governments can not recognize not the right of Israel to be defended vis-a-vis a terrorist aggression? There are truly a misinformation and a diversion of the facts in our democracies: it is unbearable to see comparing the Hamas which is an terrorist organization of which the aim is to kill out of the civilians in a democratic state which gives itself the duty to carry out a war which saves to the maximum the civilians. It is besides what repeats the Israeli management: the war is not against the Palestinian people but against the Hamas which is him even responsible for the catastrophic situation in the Gaza Strip. This terrorist group does not seek of anything an improvement living conditions in this territory and a viability if not a perpetual confrontation supplied with an irrational and talked nonsense religious fundamentalism. The democracies must choose their camp
To answer this message
-
water water water. I believe that it is clear, it is a vital resource for all, three days without and one is in general not able to living. From this area it there of ace not much and even less in Gaza, not of permanent river of the blow one draws from a water table which is not infinite (damage). I believe that this mailman weighs much in this conflict and will weigh even more heavily in the future, as long as this problem will not be to regulate and it will be it never since humanity with tendency to grow permanently, no peace will be possible. On the lack of water and the anguishes that can involve (rightly) can install the purest hatreds and given. It fire above all because it do not have water and that strongly decreases their life expectancy. And if, each party to certainly for ambition the destruction of the other, nobody wants to share a resource also essential. All the remainder is only pretext and powder with the eyes, not to deal with this problem. And this kind of conflict as threatens us, water is done rare everywhere, I believe as one will live great moments.
To answer this message
-
This area of the sphere is regarded since always as most unstable and it was the case, it is the case and it will be always the case. What astonishes to me it is the attitude of the large Arab countries particularly and of course the “great powers” there are other countries which say great powers but so small thus not to mention. words and words still, judgment statement they say all shocked. What would make Russia if 10 rockets fall on their territory on behalf of ? Similar China receives 3 shells on behalf of a Taiwanese vessel? geopoliticians or military experts they have the answer into 1/100 of dryness! Then hypocrisy or humanistic propaganda? Hamas is a terrorist faction and when one does not hesitate in between brother one should not hope for candies on behalf of people whom you wish disappearance. I wonder besides why understood one year to act. Does the proportionality (like the statistics) watch all but cover essence, a rocket, missile or , Israel have to also reapply with rocket and ?? then ask Russian quite simply to use and to subdue Chechen? Georgia could have gained if the proportionality is of setting. UNO does not have its place in this area, it is the worst than one can listen! Resolution and what still. from 8648 1455, 8977 1953 and 1982 and still 2006, the Arab conflicts showed that UNO failed on this party. Mr. B to have courage also to dictate with Lebanese to disarm the militiamans of the ! and are shame it of the #9B392C helmets beside the river to control the traffics it able? UNO still! how I see it is that Lebanon will receive its amount on behalf of soon! UNO knows it Arabic know it, the great powers too! Semi-officially, the petrodollars hope for thoroughly even Saudi Arabia it a great difference between 40 and 80 and still 100 dollars. our time our world, throw the Djihad to utter the death of people then to deplore your fate when you above are typed, they are strong these people. There must be walls of lamentations in each or Koranic school, that will facilitate comprehension. me I am in a country where there is much suffering and still much sign poverty. I am not resigned but I cannot rise the morning and to learn my kids only all what they will see elsewhere is infidels and the impure ones and whom they can gain of the tricks to the paradise if they are able to massacre them.
See on line: The punitive operation of Israel: vote-catching maneuver and accomplished fact
To answer this message
-
The let us speak in why not have finished some once and for all in 2006. Me I know the reason: the entity Zionist can attack only weakest. There is only one language which it adheres to the FORCE. It should however be guarded against any future response by the search of stability. Because during this time Iran works and not to manufacture rockets…
To answer this message
-
- >780 dead of which 1/3d' child against 10 Israeli soldiers. The figures and the facts speak about them even Gaza became a butchery. Dear Lionel a little meat of child in putrefaction?
To answer this message
-
I can understand very well that a Palestinian young person aspires to kill out of the Israeli civilians when he saw over the whole duration of his own life the members of his family and his friends to die the ones after the others, and to see the Israelis opposite colonizing the fields of olive-trees planted by his/her large parents. Humanly, the existence and the share of Hamas, are completely comprehensible.
When on the other hand, comes to Paris to affirm, amongst other things, that there is NO humanitarian crisis in Gaza, and that they at least do not aim schools, so that the FOLLOWING DAY two schools managed by UNO in Gaza are bombarded, is completely incomprehensible in my eyes, more than incomprehensible, it is dishonest person. It is a strategy of cheating, lie, play of mot.
Now, after having delivered my opinion which does not give a solution, it seems obvious to me that it is especially necessary to find the means of alleviating the Palestinian pain to arrive at peace. So that the young person of my first paragraph, ceases terrorism, and adheres to a new country opposite, it returns to Israel to be made adhere to, to develop his honesty, to propose repairs for all this destruction, to know to make so that Palestinian can find a dignity, a raison d'être, a reason to live, because these is well these lacks which pushes them with terrorism.
Israel lays out of a territory, a religion, of a standard of living, financial means and military ones. It is thus a perfectly viable country. This is why I affirm that it is well Palestine which it is necessary to support, to help, to rebuild, so that peace between the two can endure.
For all these reasons, this new Israeli offensive, appears to me once again, to move away this objective even further from peace, and encourages terrorism clearly.
I am thus well of agreement with this item which proposes to not see in this conflict a search of peace, but a search of electoral voting rights.
See on line: An opinion among others
To answer this message
-
what seeks ISRAEL to recover the Gaza Strip to make of it a party integral of its territory all the history of the country shows it, one despoiled million Palestinian their house of their ground and the international community let make, spend us one moment with the place of these people and ISRAEL continuous to nibble the grounds illegally and built districts entirety, with a government which lets make and which are not able to make comply with the rules, unfortunately the Jews believe itself in the top of the laws even if it means to everywhere crush the neighbor to take the little to him which remains to him, then the war which is the cause ?
To answer this message
-
On the tactical level, Israel considers its attack like a series of stages: initially, bombardment air solid masses with for aims 1) the destruction of the arsenal of grades, rockets as of the sites of launching very often bury, generally in Gaza, or more in north. These bombardments are precisely locate thanks to the information and it is surgery. 2) To move away the sites from shootings Palestinians of the Israeli urban centres (At the beginning of the operation Israel thought that the shootings of reprisals would reach the rate of 300 per days!!!) 3) To create a true negotiable instrument of surprised by strike air massive to destabilize and at the same time the Directorate of Political Affairs of Hamas but also to disorganize and prevent all resistance movement of the unities of Hamas In the second time, after one week of bombardment, without the terrestrial forces not being been engaged: 4) occupation of the ground by the infantry, blinds, by aviation, apart from the dense ultra urban sites, in order to attract the fire of Hamas in “open” sites 5) to cut the terrestrial communications more the military supply of Hamas while cutting into 3 Gaza 6) massive bombardment of the axis of “Philadelphia” being next to the Egyptian and larval border of tunnels in which Hamas forwarded of the weapons (with considering and with known of the Egyptian which one nothing made to prevent that during years). I think that the occupation of the town of Gaza is not considers. To regard as a true vipers' nest, it is to send to the suicide good number of soldiers, thing which the public opinion Israelienne could not support. Some points in : this operation has was organized of long time, and the lessons of the second war of Lebanon were retained: great preparation of the army, change of the military doctrines which stipulated that with strike air massive have could immediately regulate the conflict, preparations logistic of civil defense on the ground B the Israelienne population supports has 98% the operation. C Israel changes its military doctrines as for the bombardment of sites locate in the urban, same environment to the price of civil heavy losses in the camps oppose. This following the opinion of the lawyers of the army stipulating that during a military commitment, if the soldiers identified a death threat aiming them aiming at Israeliens civilians, it are in the event of same self-defense if the threat comes from a school, a mosque, or from a house of private individuals. D still a lesson of the war of Lebanon: prohibited battlefields with the press, to confiscate with the soldiers their portable telephone this in order to also deliver the war on the plan of the images and the field of the Israeli public opinion. E This operation was planned and several scenarios of exit. The time of military operation as well as the objectives has to reach were fixed in advance by taking into account the international pressure. F Exits that Israel cannot discuss with the eyes of the Israelienne public opinion: the of the axis Philadelphia, release of , the of Hamas on a military truce of at least a few years.
To answer this message
|
chronicles
Israeli military operation in the Gaza Strip defies, in term of anticipated result, the understanding. Such an operation, in an urban area , cannot be carried out that in a terrestrial way so much the impossibility of strike targeted without important civil damage is (...) 0 | | | | | | | | | All
Last items
0 | | | | | | | | | All
|
|
Bookstore Weapons & Collections
0 | | | | | | | | | All
|