George Washington - Known OPSEC Practitioner

bly, no President in history has received a legendarydiscuss certain matters in areas that British soldiers or
status equal to George Washington. His reputation asspies were able to overhear, or even to intercept
a gifted military leader stems partially from his uniquemessages meant for British forces and alter them
perspective as the leader of counterinsurgencybefore passing them along seemingly unchanged. For
forces (as a young officer in the Sevenexample: When Washington had his army outside of
Year’s War) and as the leader of anPhiladelphia he instructed his procurement officers
insurgent army (in the Revolutionary War).make sizable purchases of supplies, and even
Within OPSEC circles, Washington is often quoted asconstructed fake military facilities, which convinced
saying, "Even minutiae should have a place in ourthe British that his 3,000-strong army contained
collection, for things of a seemingly trifling nature,40,000 men.
when enjoined with others of a more serious cast,Throughout the war, Washington relied heavily on
may lead to valuable conclusion." While this is certainlyespionage and intelligence. The Culper Spy Ring,
true you must understand that this is a lesson ourheaded by Major Benjamin Talmadge (under the
first president learned through bitter, near fatalpseudonym “John Bolton”) learned
experience.that the British had plans to attack an allied French
Washington’s first experience with OPSEC (aexpedition in Rhode Island (it is not clear how British
term not used at the time, but the principles remainForces learned of the landing). Washington responded
the same) came at the age of 21 when he was aby planting false intelligence with British agents
young officer in the Seven Year’s War underindicating that he intended to move against New
British General Braddock. The effective FrenchYork City. In response, the British Commander held
intelligence network (no doubt enabled by ineffectivehis forces at New York, which had the additional
security) was able to ascertain Braddock’sbenefit of masking Washington’s movement
moves well in advance and successfully ambushedtowards Chesapeake Bay and Yorktown. It was
the combined British and Colonial forces on their firstimperative that Washington’s forces practice
expedition. In this attack, the combined forces lostgood OPSEC in order to avoid detection of this grand
615 of their officers and 914 soldiers; in additiondeception.
General Braddock was mortally wounded and barelyWashington understood the importance of educating
escaped with the aid of Washington. Before his deaththose under him about what we’ve come to
four days later, Braddock gave Washington hiscall OPSEC. In a clear early understanding of what we
ceremonial sash, one of the two reminders of thisnow know as the OPSEC process, Washington wrote
lesson that would stay with him forever.to thank James Lovell for a piece of intelligence,
If this hard lesson taught Washington one thing, itsaying, “it is by comparing a variety of
was the necessity of effective intelligence, as well asinformation, we are frequently enabled to investigate
that of secrecy. He was later quoted as saying,facts, which were so intricate or hidden, that no
“(U)pon Secrecy, Success depends in Mostsingle clue could have led to the knowledge of them..
Enterprises…and for want of it, they are. intelligence becomes interesting which but from its
generally defeated.”connection and collateral circumstances, would not be
With this philosophy, Washington would establish andimportant." He also spoke to General Rufus Putnam in
lead an effective spy network during theAugust 1777 about calculating an adversary’s
Revolutionary War. These spies would operate, atstrength, saying, "Deserters and people of that class
times, directly with or under British forces and wouldalways speak of number.. . indeed, scarce any person
provide Washington with critical military informationcan form a judgment unless he sees the troops
regarding British plans, strategies and objectives. Inparaded and can count the divisions. But, if you can
order to evade detection, all agents would memorizeby any means obtain a list of the regiments left upon
and refer only to code names (for instance, Georgethe island, we can compute the number of men
Washington was only referred to aswithin a few hundreds, over or under." This
“711” and New York was“training” prompted Federalist William
“727”), which demonstrates a clearDuer to write, “To say more in a Letter,
understanding of the importance of obfuscating keymight be imprudent” when discussing a matter
names and locations. Using the same scheme forof potential value.
names and locations also helped to hide their trueSimilarly, to the credit of the Continental Congress,
meaning. In addition, the use of secret codes, invisiblethe first secrecy agreement was adopted for
ink and encryption demonstratedgovernment employees. It read, in part, "I do
Washington’s awareness of the necessity ofsolemnly swear, that I will not directly or indirectly
not only attempting to avoid the capture ofdivulge any manner or thing which shall come to my
information, but also to prevent the use ofknowledge as (clerk, secretary) of the board of War
information should capture occur.and Ordnance for the United Colonies.. . So help me
Unfortunately, this valuable lesson seemed to beGod."
forgotten when Washington sent a seeminglyPerhaps the best example of OPSEC in
harmless letter to his dentist in Philadelphia asking forWashington’s strategy was in the attack on
denture wires and a cleaning tool. In and of itself, thisStony Point. Stony Point was an ominous British fort
letter provided no military intelligence of value when iton the Hudson River, with walls 150 feet high, water
and other messages were captured by the British.on three sides and a swamp on the fourth, and an
However, some of the other messages indicated aimposing garrison of 500 men and many cannons.
potential attack on New York. Sir Henry Clinton, thenColonel Wayne was convinced that it could be taken,
chief of the British Army, was skeptical. The lettersand eventually convinced Washington that it could be
almost seemed too good to be true especially whendone. Washington approved the plan with the advice,
you understand that Washington’s skill in"That is should be attempted by the Light Infantry
military deception was known by the enemy. Clintononly, which should march under cover of the night
was left to wonder of the validity and value of theand with the utmost secrecy to the enemy's lines,
“intelligence.” However, Clintonsecuring every person they find to prevent
correctly reasoned that this letter would most likelydiscovery”. Note especially the use of
not have been included in a package was to bedarkness to mask movement and the securing of
intentionally “captured” and surmisedpotential witnesses/agents. Because of this secrecy,
that the captured intelligence was legitimate. Clintonthe surprise attack was a success resulting in only 15
was able to strengthen his forces in New York,American deaths versus 63 British.
prompting Washington to abandon that campaign.Clearly, George Washington effectively led the newly
This setback did not discourage Washington fromformed army to victory not only because of
continuing to use deception and disinformationexcellent military tactics, but also because a solid
however. This lesson learned became a veryunderstanding of OPSEC. If OPSEC can help General
effective strategy to fabricate documents to beWashington win a war then who are we to deny its
“captured”, or to instruct agents touse today to protect our sensitive information?